Reporting and Ratings
EnBW is consistently measuring KPIs group-wide alongside the dimensions of sustainability (economy, environment and social). With the publication of these key figures, EnBW stakeholders (among others customers, NGOs and rating agencies) are informed transparently about achievements and progress of EnBW. Based on these KPIs improvement measures are identified, activities are controlled and achievement of targets is analyzed on regular basis.
Sustainability ratings
EnBW is regularly valuated by various rating agencies in the area of sustainability and finance.
In the financial area EnBW is valuated by the following agencies: Moody's, Standard & Poors and Fitch. Click here for more detailed information
Performances in the non financial area are valuated by the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), ISS-oekom and Sustainalytics. Since 2007 CDP annually determines EnBW's achievements with regard to climate protection and provides the information to investors and other interested stakeholders. Approximately every two years, ISS-oekom (since 2011) and Sustainalytics (since 2012) are valuating the entire sustainability performance of EnBW.
Current EnBW ratings
|
CDP
|
ISS ESG
|
MSCI
|
Sustainalytics
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
result
|
CDP
B/Management (2019)
|
ISS ESG
B-/prime status(2019)
|
MSCI
AA/Leader (2019)
|
Sustainalytics
77/Outperformer (2019)
|
|
„relative
position – competition“ |
CDP
"Electric Utilities" sector globally: EnBW achieved a place in the top 25 %.
|
ISS ESG
"Utilities/Multi Utilities" sector globally: EnBW achieved a place in the top 10 %.
|
MSCI
"Utilities" sector globally: EnBW achieved a place in the top 24 %.
|
Sustainalytics
"Utilities" sector globally: EnBW achieved a place in the top 14 %.
|
|
evaluation focus
|
CDP
Climate aspects
|
ISS ESG
Social, governance and environmental aspects
|
MSCI
Social, governance and environmental aspects
|
Sustainalytics
Social, governance and environmental aspects
|
EnBW rating history
|
CDP
|
ISS ESG
|
MSCI
|
Sustainalytics
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
CDP
B (2018)
|
ISS ESG
B- (2018)
|
MSCI
AA (2018)
|
Sustainalytics
73 (2018)
|
|
CDP
A- (2017)
|
ISS ESG
B- (2017)
|
MSCI
AA (2017)
|
Sustainalytics
68 (2017)
|
|
CDP
B (2016)
|
ISS ESG
C+ (2015)
|
MSCI
AA (2016)
|
Sustainalytics
71 (2015)
|
Rating scales of CDP, ISS ESG and Sustainalytics
|
Rating
|
Rating scales
|
|---|---|
|
Rating
CDP
|
Rating scales
Scale “A to D” (Leadership A/A-; Management B/B-; Awareness C/C-; Disclosure D/D-)
|
|
Rating
ISS ESG
|
Rating scales
Scale “A+ to D-“ (excellent: A+/A/A-; good: B+/B/B-; medium (C+/C/C-); poor: D+/D/D-)
|
|
Rating
MSCI
|
Rating scales
Scale: AAA to CCC (Leader AAA - AA; Average A - BB; Laggard B - CCC)
|
|
Rating
Sustainalytics
|
Rating scales
Relative position within industry (0% to 100%): Leader, Outperformer, Average Performer, Underperformer, Industry Laggard
|